Catwoman: Queen of Snark, expert thief, master of the bull whip and able to disguise herself into virtually any situation, including sneaking past Batman. |
Plenty of people have weighed in on how women are portrayed in comics. The argument consistently seems to boil down to "It makes real women feel bad" on one side and "But that's what the customers want" on the other.
Scarlet Witch: able to bend reality to her will (as in, she imagines it, it happens), shoots hex bolts, can teleport, fly and move objects with her mind. |
Wonder Woman: super strong, super fast, bullet-bouncing bracelets, Golden Lariat of Truth, expert in bow, sword and hand-to-hand combat. Oh yeah, and immortal. |
Heroines in comic books face the same challenge. Those who might be truly inspired by the strength and depth of these characters and stories also tend to dismiss them because of how they are drawn. Granted, sometimes these powerful ladies are forced into "damsel-in-distress" roles or pushed aside in favour of the male characters, but at one time or another, each has found herself in the hands of talented writers who utilize their strengths and weaknesses to reveal incredible three-dimensional characters and powerful stories.
Supergirl: invulnerable, x-ray vision, laser/heat vision, super strong, super fast, can fly, super breath (ie, can blow out building fires). |
And yet, at the same time, I find myself asking: why shouldn't they have it all? Why shouldn't they be brilliant, powerful, dynamic and gorgeous? Women shouldn't have to settle for being less than they can be in order to make other people feel better. That would be blatantly against everything that we have fought for.
Batgirl: superior speed, flexibility and strength, expert in hand to hand combat, expert marksman with projectile weapons, master of stealth and distraction, makes her own explosive/smoke pellets. |
Black Widow: superior agility, expert marksman, gymnast and contortionist, brilliant tactician and political analyst. |
No comments:
Post a Comment